The Contempoary internet user
Since the emergence of the internet not only has the content and application of it changed and expanded, but so too has the contemporary internet user. With the internet boom in full swing we have seen a new generation of internet users created, defined as the “digital natives”. Experts have attempted to categorise the contemporary internet user or “digital natives” as they are referred to, with various opinions arising. Articles by both Marc Prensky and Dave Weinberger represent views of the contemporary internet user, both portraying different representations, but both true within themselves. These articles set a benchmark for considering what implications the internet has on us as individuals and society.
When the term ‘internet user’ arises, many of us can associate both negative and positive connotations. Marc Prensky’s article “the emerging online life of the digital native” summarises one view of the contemporary internet user. Prensky (2004) suggests that digital natives are inventing new and interesting ways to do each activity online based on the technologies they have available to them and their online life has become more than just the internet, it has become a strategy to survive in the twenty-first century. Digital natives have changed the way they do virtually everything on the internet, from the way they communicate, create, coordinate, exchange, learn and most importantly socialise (Prensky 2004). Prensky (2004) claims that these changes signify more than anything that the digital native generation is moving ahead in its own direction and it’s incorporating technology in everyday life in unexpected ways. A survey of 200,000 U.S students concludes that “Students are not just using technology different today, but are approaching their life and their daily activities differently because of technology” (Netday survey 2004). The overall impression we as readers take away from Prensky’s article is that the internet is allow us to express our creativity on a larger scale and expand the possibilities of the internet for generations to come to benefit from. There is positive impression of the contemporary internet user conveyed through this article.
Weinberger’s article “A New World” takes a very different angle on the contemporary internet user than Prensky’s article expresses. Weinberger (2002) suggests that the web is this version of a ‘new world’ and society in general have issues distinguishing between the real world and this virtual world (the web). As internet users we are continuously rewriting ourselves on the web, we’re saying and doing things we never expected and we’re meeting people we never dreamed of meeting, but more importantly we’re meeting new aspects of ourselves (Weinberger 2002). But this virtual world is affecting more than our shopping experiences, it’s affecting the way we are social. “The web is a world we’ve made for one another. It can only be understood within a web of ideas that includes our cultures foundational thoughts” (David Weinberger 2002). Weinberger (2002) believes this virtual world or the web as we know it is corrupting our mind and our ability to interact in the real world. As readers we are positioned to believe that the internet is a affecting our ability to interact in the real world and corrupting our minds by allowing us to enter this virtual world. This article associates negative connotations with the internet and its impact on users.
Despite the fact that both of these articles conclude different views of the contemporary internet user we can see accurate portrayals in both of them. Prensky’s article suggests that internet users today are using their access to internet to advance technologically and also creatively, on the other hand Weinberger’s article suggests that the internet is affecting our social skills and corrupting our minds. Within society Weinberger’s view is more commonly supported especially among the digital immigrant population. What is far more interesting is the increase of a neutral view of internet users, with experts claiming it’s the user that determines how the internet affects their life and not the other way around. A BBC article titled ‘the effects of the internet on society’ takes a neutral position on how the internet affects us claiming “the Internet is here to stay, and it's really up to us how it affects society and whether it enhances or ruins our life” (BBC 2001). I believe this statement by the BBC to be incredibly accurate, majority of us can admit that we’re addicted to Facebook or Myspace or even YouTube and we always communicating with friends on the web and yet we are still the same people. The affects of the internet I believe depends entirely on the individual. Articles by Barry Wellman (2002) and Angie Guan (2009) support the fact that the internet is a part of everyday life and it’s only growing as technology advances. Barry Wellman’s (2002) article ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’, explains that regardless of the negative opinions of the internet viewed by people within society the internet isn’t going anywhere fast and it’s up to users to determine how they approach it. In the 2009 article ‘Youth Internet use: Risks and Opportunities’ by Angie Guan it is said that there are risks involved in using the internet, like becoming anti-social, socially incapable or even disturbed, but if society solely holds these risks as the only outcome of using the internet that is what’s going to happen. In order for people to be able to overcome the issues on the internet society needs to work together to see the internet as a better place, there will always be risks but the more aware users are the less likely it will occur (Guan 2009) There are internet users out there proving the opinions by Weinberger and Prensky, some of us are using the internet for creativity and technological creations and then some of us are being affected psychologically by the effects of the internet,
So it can be said that while there are varying opinions of the contemporary internet user, both Weinberger and Prensky’s views are accurate because they both identify aspects that internet users can relate to. In saying this, I believe it depends on the user as to how they are affected and the internet can’t hold a single stereotype for every internet user, the web is incredibly broad and so too are the range of internet users. The contemporary internet user cannot ultimately be classified as either of the opinions expressed, but they express aspects that relate to internet users that are present within society.
Prensky, M, ‘The Emerging Online Life of the Digital Native’ 2004
http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-The_Emerging_Online_Life_of_the_Digital_Native-03.pdf (link to display in blog)
Weinberger, D, ‘A New World’ 2002
http://www.smallpieces.com/content/chapter1.html (link for blog)
BBC, ‘The internet’s affect on society’ 2001
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A650684 (link for blog)
The Internet in Everyday Life, Barry Wellman 2002, Blackwell publishers Ltd.
Youth Internet use: Risks and opportunities 2009 Shu-Sha Angie Guan
Websites related to internet users
This is an article by Cate Swannell on internet users (April 2009)
http://www.goldcoast.com.au/article/2009/04/03/65695_cate-swannell-opinion.html (accessed 16th October 2009)
Psych Central, John Grohol, ‘Internet Addiction’ 1999
http://psychcentral.com/netaddiction/ (accessed 16th October 2009)
BBC, ‘Sci/Tech caught on the net’ 1999
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/427674.stm (link for blog)
Implications of the internet on Global society and culture http://www.coolavenues.com/cafe/articles/shubham_1.php3 (link for blog)
Future of the internet and how to stop it blog http://futureoftheinternet.org/









